DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
701 §. COURTHOUSE ROAD
ARLINGTON, VA 22204
JBH
Docket No. NR7437-13
25 March 2014
cation for correction of your naval
of 10 USC 1552.
This is in reference to your appli
record pursuant to the provisions
f the Board for Correction of Naval Fecords,
gitting in executive session, considered your application on
24 March 2014. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed
in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures
applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material
considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with
all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies. in addition, the Board
considered the advisory opinion Furnished by NPC Memo 7220 Ser-835/053
dated a copy of which is attached.
A three-member panel o
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record,
the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to
establish the existence of probable Material error or injustice. In
making this determination, the Board substantially concurred with the
comments contained in the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your
application has been denied. The names ang votes of the members of
the panel wiil be furnished upon request.
stances of your case are such that
You are entitled
ssion of new and material evidence
It is regretted that the eircum
favorable action cannot be taken.
reconsider its decision upon submi
or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this
regard, it is important to keep in mind that a presumption of
regularity attaches to all official records. Consequently, when
applying for a correc 1 record, the burden is
on the applicant to demon f£ probable material
error or injustice.
tion of an official nava
strate the existence 0
Sincerely,
ROBERT D. ALMAN
Acting Executive Director
o 7220 Ser-835/053 datcd Sen
Enclosure: NPC Mem
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 09942-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 February 2011. The Board considered the advisory opinions furnished by Navy Personnel Command (NPC) memo 1430 Ser 811/559 of 22 Oct 10, and NPC memo 7220 PERS-835 of 12 Jan 11, copies of which are attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 09140-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 22 February 2011. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 01398-11
1398-11 AT ve DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY | 48 Jul 11 This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2481 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 November 2014. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4261 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S, COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 DJC Docket No. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. in addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion Furnished by NPC memo 1811 Pers- 835/070 dated 30 December 2014, a COpy of which was provided to you...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 05106-03
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 October 2003. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNO memorandum 7220 Ser N130C3103U0637 dated 5 September 2003, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 00028-03
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Reference (a) request comments and recommendations in subject officer's case.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2075 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 April 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, tthe burden is on the applicant to ‘demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6066 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 November 2014. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by OCNO Memo 7220 Ser Wi30C/14U1348 dated 15 October 2014, a copy of which was sent to you on 18 October 2014; it was returned to sender on 5 November 2014. De Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR777 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 September 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. However, after careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to...